Transcript of Dr. Dan Stock to the Mt Vernon Community School Corporation
• Friday August 7th 2021 • Mt Vernon Indiana • Guilty as charged •
Dr. Dan Stock, [redacted]
The address you're about to see is hard to believe 18 months
into this and still having a problem. And I would suggest the reason we still
have a problem is because we're doing things that are not useful and we're
getting our sources of information from the Indiana State board of Health and
the CDC who actually don't bother to read science before they do this.
I'm actually a functional family medicine physician. That
means I am specialty trained in immunology and inflammation, regulation.
And everything being recommended by the CDC and the State
Board of Health is actually contrary to all the rules of science.
So, things you should know about coronavirus and all other
respiratory viruses, they are spread by aerosol particles which are small
enough to go through every mask.
By the way, the literature that supports all of that is in a
flash drive that we presented to you. It's been given to the secretary.
As a matter of fact, it quotes at least three studies that’s
sponsored by the NIH to that exact fact, even though the CDC and the NIH have
chosen to ignore the very science that they paid to have done.
That is why you keep struggling with this, is because you
cannot make these viruses go away.
The natural history of all respiratory viruses is that they
circulate all year long waiting for the immune system to get sick through the
winter or become deranged, as has happened recently with these vaccines. And
then they cause symptomatic disease because they cannot be filtered out and
they have animal reservoirs.
And this is a very important point. No one can make this
virus go away. The CDC has managed to convince everybody that we can handle
this like we did smallpox, where we could make a virus go away.
Smallpox had no animal reservoirs. The only thing it learned
to infect was humans. That's why we're able to make that virus go away. That
will not happen with this any more than it will with influenza, the common
cold, respiratory syncytial virus, adenoviral respiratory syndromes, or
anything else that has animal reservoirs.
So, the reason you can't do this is because you're trying to
do something which has already been tried and can't be done.
Equally important is that vaccination changes none of this,
especially with this vaccine. And I would hope this board would start asking
itself before it considers taking the advice of the CDC, the NIH and the state
board of health, why we are doing things about this that we didn't do for the
common cold, influenza, or respiratory syncytial virus?
And then ask yourself, why is a vaccine that is supposedly
so effective having a breakout in the middle of the summer when respiratory
viral syndromes don't do that?
And to help you understand that you need to know the
condition that is called antibody mediated viral enhancement. That is a
condition done when vaccines work wrong, as they did in every coronavirus study
done in animals on coronaviruses after the SARS outbreak and done in
respiratory syncytial virus where a vaccine used in a vulnerable individual,
done the wrong way, which why it cannot be done right for respiratory virus,
which has a very low pathogenicity rate, causes the immune system to actually
fight the virus wrong and let the virus become worse than it would with native
infection.
And that is why you are seeing an outbreak right now. In fact,
in that flash drive you're going to have coming to you in the emails with six
extra [??obiate] studies showing that 75 percent of people who had covid-19
positive symptom cases in Barnstable, Massachusetts outbreak were fully
vaccinated.
Therefore, there is no reason for treating any person
vaccinated any differently than any person unvaccinated. You should also know
that no vaccine, even the ones I support and would give to myself and my
children, ever stops infection. In 2014, there was outbreak of mumps in the
National Hockey League. The only people who came down the symptoms were the
people who were unvaccinated or unknown vaccine status. Boy, that sounds like a
great argument for vaccines, but a question that you should ask yourself,
knowing that half of the people who came down with symptomatic disease had no
contact with an unvaccinated or unknown vaccine status individual, where did
they get the disease?
And the answer was “from the vaccinated individuals.” No
vaccine prevents you from getting infection. You get infected, you shed
pathogen. This is especially true of viral respiratory pathogens. You just
don't get symptomatic from it.
So, you cannot stop spread. You cannot make these numbers
that you've planned on get better by doing any of the things you're doing,
because that is the nature of viral respiratory pathogens.
And you can't prevent it with a vaccine because they don't
do the very thing, you're wanting them to do.
And you will be chasing this the remainder of your life
until you recognize that the Center for Disease Control and the Indiana State
Board of Health are giving you very bad scientific guidance. And instead read
the articles that are coming in the email and on this flash drive and listen to
the people in this audience here tonight who actually have recognized the
advice they are getting from the CDC and the NIH is counterfactual.
And that's why you're still fighting this with this vaccine
that supposedly was going to make all of this go away. But it suddenly managed
to make an outbreak of covid-19 develop in the middle of the summer when
vitamin D levels are at their highest.
By the way, the other thing that would be necessary, any
vaccine restriction to be considered is if there were no other treatment
available. And I can tell you, having treated over 15 covid-19 patients, that
between active loading with vitamin D, ivermectin and zinc, that there is not a
single person who has come anywhere near the hospital.
And we already have studies that show that if you achieve a
25 hydroxy vitamin D level greater than fifty-five, your risk of covid-19 death
will drop down to one quarter of the population average for the United States.
And there are active treatment trials included on that flash
drive that the show the same is true. So, if you were going to discriminate
based upon vaccine, you should also discriminate based upon 25 hydroxy vitamin
D level, zinc taste test response, and probably previous infections.
Since there are also studies like Flash Drive that show that
people who have recovered from covid-19 infection actually get no benefit from
vaccination at all, no reduction in symptoms, no reduction in hospitalization
and suffer two to four times the rate of side effects if they are subsequently
vaccinated.
Therefore, the policies that you are basing on are totally
counterfactual.
I don't blame this board for that because I know you aren't
scientists and you've thought it was reasonable to listen to the CDC, NIH and
the Indiana State Board of Health, but I would encourage that instead, you
listen to the people out here in this audience and read what's on that data
drive.
And if anybody here in this board has any questions about
anything on that, I will happily come back and sit with you individually. If
you would like to explain the science behind this and if you're worried about
being sued by somebody because you don't follow the guidance of the CDC and the
NIH, I will tell you have a free pro bono expert testimony at your disposal.
I will testify in defense of this court turning down all
these recommendations for free at any time, in any court. Thank you.
Dr. Dan Stock
FLASH DRIVE SOURCES:
In his presentation, he
references a flash drive he gave the school board members to review with all of
the scientific literature he referenced.
Click on the links to access the following studies.
1. SARS-CoV2-Transmission
Among Marine Recruits during Quarantine.
2. Longitudinal
analysis shows durable and broad immune memory after SARS-CoV-2 infection with
persisting antibody responses and memory B and T cells.
3. Vitamin
D for prevention of respiratory tract infections: A systematic review and
meta-analysis.
4. Facemasks in the COVID-19 era: A health hypothesis
5. CDC
assessment of non-pharmaceutical influenza methods.
6. Federalist
cases/mortality mask comparison
7. Heritage
Foundation Study - In fact, mask use during the pandemic has been
recommended by The Heritage Foundation’s Coronavirus Commission guidelines.
However, our findings do suggest that public health strategies relying
predominantly on mask mandates are inadequate, and thus other initiatives, in
addition to mask wearing, should have been a component of policies aimed to
limit the spread of the disease.
8. Declaration of Great Barrington-
The Great Barrington Declaration- As infectious disease epidemiologists and
public health scientists we have grave concerns about the damaging physical and
mental health impacts of the prevailing COVID-19 policies, and recommend an
approach we call Focused Protection. Over 60,000 medical experts
have signed this declaration.
9. Covid-19
Breakthrough Infections in Vaccinated Health Care Workers.
10. Calcifediol
Treatment and Hospital Mortality Due to COVID-19: A Cohort Study
11. Experimental
Assessment of Carbon Dioxide Content in Inhaled Air With or Without Face Masks
in Healthy Children.
12. Calcifediol
treatment and COVID-19-related outcomes
13. "Effect
of calcifediol treatment and best available therapy versus best available
therapy on intensive care unit admission and mortality among patients
hospitalized for COVID-19: A pilot randomized clinical study.
14. Effectiveness of
Adding a Mask Recommendation to Other Public Health Measures to Prevent SARS-CoV-2
Infection in Danish Mask Wearers
15. Community
Use Of Face Masks And COVID-19: Evidence From A Natural Experiment Of State
Mandates In The US
16. Face-Masks
in the COVID-19 era: A health hypothesis
17. Infection
Fatality Ratios for COVID-19 Among Non-Institutionalized Persons 12 and Older:
Results of a Random-Sample Prevalence Study
18. Open Schools,
COVID-19, and Child and Teacher Morbidity in Sweden.
19. Face-Masks to
prevent transmission of influenza virus: a systematic review
20. Outbreak
of SARS-CoV-2 Infections, Including COVID-19 Vaccine Breakthrough Infections,
Associated with Large Public Gathering- Barnstable County, Massachusetts, July
2021
21. Short
term, high-dose vitamin D supplementation for COVID-19 disease: a randomized,
placebo-controlled, study
22. Rapid Expert
Consultation on the Effectiveness of Fabric Masks for the COVID-19 Pandemic
(April 8, 2020)
0 comments:
Post a Comment